|
Survivor: China Post Season Editing Analysis
For those unfamiliar with it, Edgic is
essentially using a combination of editing and game logic
to not only determine the winner, but the likely
placements for much of the cast as well. It's far from
foolproof, but it can be a fun way to analyze the season
and potentially improve your predictions for the office
pool without resorting to spoilers.
beatles20147 -
12.24.07
Well, we've wrapped up an
excellent season of Survivor, easily the best one since Pearl
Islands. And as always, I made a bunch of predictions, most of which
turned out to be flat-out wrong. But alas, all of these columns
remain up, so this time, I can't hide behind them. Instead, I'll
embrace them as we take a look back with a very special edition of
beatles' Edgic column…
WEEK 1
"Don't worry; I have no
intention of getting a new all-time favorite, but don't be surprised
if I make a comment like 'I am seriously in love with Courtney' in a
few weeks. In fact, be surprised if I don't. Unfortunately, she made
an immediate negative impression with viewers—that's not really a
good sign for her chances of making it super-far, because I can't
really see them trying to make a Kathy-esque comeback story with
someone like Courtney."
Well, I was right about me
loving her, does that count? I'm incredibly glad I was wrong about
her making it far; she was the best.
"Which brings me to a
scene that was an exception, and is obviously going to pay off
somehow later on: Todd and Jean-Robert's 'I can tell you're clever'
chat. In the context of the premiere, it made little sense, other
than to get in a reminder that Jean-Robert is a professional poker
player. The obvious guess here is that either one of the two will
lead to the other's exit, or the pair will form an alliance down the
road—or maybe both. Obviously Jean-Robert's strategy worked at
least a little bit, as it instilled paranoia in Todd. "Don't
tell anyone that you think I'm smart, I don't want them to know
that." As we saw in the preview, Jean-Robert is called out for
being lazy next week. Will he be a target and make a last-ditch
effort and reach out to Todd for help? More often than not, the
previews are red herrings, so I'm going to guess that we won't see
anything more than small bits and pieces of their relationship until
later down the road, assuming they both last that long."
They were allies (at least from
Jean-Robert's perspective) and the scene did pay off, but it was
actually the winner giveaway that didn't catch my eye that first
week.
"Sherea's "I'm not
so good in the outdoors" story is reminiscent of Cirie's story
in the Panama premiere, only the "fun underdog" angle is
replaced by the "miserable party pooper" angle. Don't
expect her to last as long as Cirie, and if she makes it past the
next few weeks, I'll bet that she gets an under-the-radar edit just
because it's such a depressingly boring storyline and she seems
about as exciting as Vecepia."
She lasted five more weeks and
was under the radar at the beginning but emerged later as a huge
character in her last three episodes. So I get half-credit here.
"Nobody called James out
as being too much of a loner, so I'm wondering why they stressed
that he needs to charm people. Will he be another Matthew and enter
the game with no social skills and emerge as one of the best
players? Or is he just another Brandon—a quiet, likable guy who
will be too big a target to keep around after the merge? Logic would
dictate that he won't leave pre-merge—he's quite possibly the
physically strongest player ever. His antisocial nature might make
him a decoy boot in early episodes if Fei Long makes the trek to
Tribal, but I'll be banking on amazing comeback story."
He
certainly didn't turn into a great player at any point—he left
with two guaranteed safety nets in his pocket. All in all, this
scene never really came into play. I think it was included as an
early way of making James into the fan favorite.
"Aaron was built up as a
cautious leader—he made sure to subtly step into the role
(although it wasn't quite as subtle as he thought, since Todd called
him out on it before the challenge), but he wasn't as cocky and
assured as many past early leaders. If his physical and social
prowess weren't enough to convince me that he'd be safe for a little
bit, his edit certainly was. He seemed likable enough that if he can
continue his leadership role past the first few merge Tribal
Councils (i.e. if Fei Long enters the merge with a majority) he
might do very well."
Damn you, twists!
"I would
probably pick James as of right now, but that's completely out of
the blue"
Damn you, not using hidden
idols!
WEEK 2
"Todd of course is one of
the biggest characters of the season, and as cool as he seems, his
edit does seem reminiscent of the past few seasons in that he seems
to get more airtime than others for no real reason. But I'll steal a
cue from a Suckster, Pulua Tiga, who has pointed out a few
similarities between Amanda's edit so far and Danni's."
Damn you, Pulua Tiga!
"Over at Zhan Hu, the
bulk of the airtime consisted of the Dave/Ashley fight, so basically
all we got out of that was that a) Dave isn't gonna win, and b)
Sherea is like a less interesting, more miserable version of
Judd—she briefly complains back at camp and then explodes at
Tribal Council. I still don't see her sticking around too long, so I
don't know if she'll ever move out of this edit the way Judd
did."
She didn't, which is a shame
because we saw in the recap episode that she was actually kind of
fun. And Dave didn't win but you didn't need me to tell you that.
"So now…who's winning
this thing? Todd seems like a good candidate, as he's always been
shown to have his head on his shoulders. I still don't think James
is totally out of the running, and Amanda could have a Danni-like
winning edit here, although hopefully with some more
visibility…and for once, I don't mean that as a joke about her top
coming off."
My first acknowledgement of Todd
and Amanda as winner candidates, although I actually might have been
leaning towards Amanda at this point.
WEEK 4
"Aaron's airtime has
dropped somewhat from the first two weeks—he's always been a bit
bland, but when he isn't feuding with Jean-Robert or trying to
'subtly' lead, he doesn't have much to say. Still, he's never
completely ignored, so I wouldn't count him out just yet—and if a
younger alpha male wins for the fourth season in a row, they
probably would want to downplay his edit."
Downplay a male winner? I crack
myself up sometimes!
"Amanda pops in from time
to time, occasionally with a strategic comment but usually her
airtime is fluff or flashing her boobs at challenges. Her edit is
nowhere near as strong as most people seem to think, and I think
it's obvious why that is. Nonetheless, there's been no reason to
knock her out of winner contention from the edit."
I was right—there was an
Amanda wins spoiler. But I did let everyone picking her convince me
that she was still a possible winner when I should've had the guts
to knock her out long before.
"Courtney's still my
favorite, and like Amanda, I don't think she's gotten the
"winner edit" but other than a few possibly crass comments
in the first episode (negative first impressions aren't a good
sign), there's no reason to discount her either. One thing working
against her chances was that the recap of the most recent episode
harped on her poor performance at last week's immunity challenge and
made no mention of Jean-Robert and James's crude discussion about
her. To be totally not objective, I'm hoping she laughs cynically
all the way to the bank. But objectively, I think we might be in for
an alternating positive and negative edit until her eventual boot.
Please prove me wrong!"
They proved me wrong! Ok, so she
did kind of get an alternating positive and negative edit, and she
didn't win…but she never got booted either. I'm a glass-full kind
of guy.
"Jean-Robert on the other
hand was pretty negative for the first three weeks—and then out of
nowhere spoke Mandarin and got a pretty positive edit this week. His
strategy has moved into phase 2, and it seems to be working. Could
this be the ultimate comeback story, or did he start too negatively
to win the million? Comeback edits generally don't result in
victory, as I'm sure Kathy can attest to."
I was either completely wrong
here, or it was the worst attempt at a comeback edit ever. What do
you think is more likely?
"I'm going with Todd
again, but at the same time I think we're due for a female winner
(at least I hope so)."
I believe that week 4 is when I
officially picked Todd as the winner. I would've loved to see
Courtney or Peih-Gee win but you know, Todd being the fourth male
winner in a row isn't a bad thing; he played a great game.
WEEK 6
"One of the biggest
arguments supporting an Amanda victory is that female winners tend
to be under-edited. And to be honest, a quiet beauty queen
triumphing over a gay Mormon isn't something that hasn't happened
before on Survivor, so it could happen again. I think she has a
chance, but for most viewers, she's nothing more than Todd's lackey.
We haven't seen any of the subtle manipulation like we did with Rafe
and Danni. I'm surprised she has as much support as she does,
considering that she isn't playing that differently from the
under-the-radar coattail riders people acclaim her for not being.
Then again, Rafe and Danni's storyline didn't start until the merge,
so there's certainly time for this story to advance in her
favor."
This was around the time when
Amanda was pretty much seen as an equally possible winner as Todd in
Edgic (and eventually she overtook him). I really think people were
putting too much weight into the spoiler and/or their desire to see
another female winner when it came to picking Amanda. And that's not
the way Edgic is supposed to work (especially the spoiler part).
"Ever since the negative
reaction to Jenna Morasca's victory in Amazon (don't even get me
started), the editors have been very cautious to make the winners
likable and at least semi-positive. In the pre-Amazon days (and
China is pretty reminiscent of those), Jean-Robert would certainly
be a possible winner based on his edit. But it's not going to
happen. Sigh."
Interestingly enough, Todd
probably had the most negativity of any winner since Chris. He was
far from negative overall but at least we got some depth unlike with
Danni or Yul.
"And that leaves Todd
Herzog…my winner prediction. It took me a few weeks to come around
to his side—as a winner, that is. As a character, I still find him
incredibly generic and overusing strategic clichés, but part of
that's the editors' fault too. But after three seasons of the winner
being essentially like this, why would that pattern change? But let
me add the standard 'He seems like a nice guy' disclaimer, and Todd,
if you're reading this, drop me a line and maybe we could go grab a
bite to eat or something. Of course, I'd expect you to treat me,
being that you're the one with the million bucks, you know."
He does seem like a nice guy,
and Todd, you know how to contact me on Sucks. I assume Chinese?
WEEK 7
"No, Todd's real doubt
came with a scene that did not have to be included at
all—Jean-Robert's threat. It was clear from the duo's scene in the
premiere that this was going to be a critical relationship in the
game, and Jean-Robert has now set the stage for what may
happen."
I'm freakin' brilliant
sometimes.
"But that brings me to my
dark, dark horse pick for the winner—Courtney. Most people have
given up on her chances, but this scene gives me hope that the best
post-ASS female may take home the prize."
And not so much at others. But
hey, she came close!
"I suppose Amanda's
support comes out of Danni's win four seasons ago. Just like
Guatemala was the story of how Steph lost the game, some people
think that China will be the story of how Todd loses. One problem
with this theory: the editors have no reason to single out Todd from
the fourteen others to show why he loses."
I don't want to say I told you
so, but this was what killed Amanda's chances of winning for me.
Todd was cocky, but he wasn't so negative that people would be happy
to see him lose in the final three and someone else win "by
default."
"Based on the way the
game is going, as well as the edit, I think Erik's the likely pick
to take the long walk home this week"
This prediction was actually
meant for my column for three weeks later. It somehow slipped into
this one, so I wouldn't blame you for thinking that I was wrong. But
trust me, I must've just forgotten to proofread. Won't happn agen===
WEEK 9
"I know [Amanda's] the
popular pick, but I still think that if she were the winner, she
would be shown as less of a lackey, and we'd have more than one or
two scenes where she shows herself to be the half of the alliance
with her head on straight."
Logic > spoilers.
"I'm not a fan, but there
isn't enough backlash that would make viewers satisfied with someone
winning against Todd by default…'You're not Todd' would make sense
for Jean-Robert's vote, but that's about it."
Of course I pick a guy who
actually voted for Todd. Chalk this one up to another proofreading
error.
WEEK 11
"Gamewise, an
Amanda/Courtney/Todd F3 is making the most sense. Edgically, it's
Courtney/Todd/Peih-Gee. Of course, what I'm hoping for is that Jaime
gets kicked off the jury because they finally realize that nobody
likes the final three. So bring on the Courtney/Peih-Gee final
two!"
The only pro to Jaime being on
the jury would be the possibility of Courtney doing her spot-on
impression to Jaime's face. I hate the final three. But I got it
right though.
So that's it for a fantastic
season of Survivor. Next stop: Micronesia in early February. I'll do
my best to be back for this one, even if I'm not particularly loving
the concept. Thanks for reading, and I'll see you then!
|