Survivor: Cook Islands
Jeff Probst Media Teleconference
Probst Conducted a Teleconference in
Which He Answered Questions from Various Members of the Media
- 9.07.06
Please credit:
Transcript by SurvivorFever.net
Question: Let me ask you about some of
the reaction to the new alignment of the tribes. Have you
been surprised at all by the reaction and what are your thoughts
about it now?
Jeff: I think when most people hear the idea
their first reaction is to flinch a little bit. It's a
sensitive topic and we understand that. But I think if
people give it a chance they are going to be surprised at the
results. I think there are some who are probably very
familiar with Survivor and still just don't think this was a
good idea. That's a fair and valid opinion. I also
think, in addition to people who are familiar with the show and
just don't like the idea, there are a lot of people who have
never seen Survivor, have absolutely no idea what they are
condemning but are using this as a platform for their own
agenda. I hope that all the people who have their
megaphones out condemning the show before they've ever seen a
minute of it will be just as vocal when it's over. And if
you still don't like it after you've seen it, shout it
out. But if it surprised you or your expectations were
reversed, I hope you'll be just as vocal.
Question: You guys did the casting or
the picking of the contestants a little bit differently.
Could you talk a little bit about actually having to go out and
reach out to people to fill out these teams? And how that
made things different?
Jeff: Once we decided that we were going
to have the most ethnic diverse cast in the history of TV as far
as I know, it required us to go out and find these people.
We don't have many minorities that apply to the
show. So we did go to church groups and we did go to
cultural centers. Literally, it was the biggest casting
endeavor we've done in 13 seasons. In the beginning it
seemed like a daunting task. What we discovered in the
process is, we found the most fresh cast of people that we've
had going back to season one. Because we're finding people
who aren't Survivor savvy. They haven't applied to the
show. In a lot of cases they didn't even watch it.
Which is another interesting thing. When you build a show
and put a majority of the people on the show white and you have
white people watch it, it kind of becomes a self-fulfilling
prophecy. We got into the Hispanic community and we start
finding people who think, 'wow Survivor, it sounds like a very
cool idea. You mean I live on my own, I get to build
shelter and fish and I could win a million dollars.' When
we were in the room we start looking at these people and we go,
"Wow, we're having fresh points of view again."
We don't have people coming in saying, "I'm gonna be just
like Colby." Now we have people coming in saying,
"I think it's a pretty cool idea that I can get out there
and fish. That sounds fun." All of a
sudden the show in our minds re-birthed itself. Which is a
direct correlation to why we started the show the way we did
this season. We start the show exactly like we did Season
One. Because Mark really reconnected with his
original idea for the show. Immediately during casting I
remember Mark saying, "This is like Season One. Let's start
the show like Season One." For all of us it really
did reenergize us. I'm telling you, if you watch this
season you'll feel that. I think you'll sense a freshness.
Question: I understand that more of the cast
than usual seem to have show business ties. At least one
of them has been on a lot of sitcoms. In spreading out the
net did you find yourself with more bartender/waiter and actress
wannabees than usual or is there a reason why so many people
seem to have some attachment to show business?
Jeff: I could be completely off my
rocker here but that seems absolutely wrong. I'm thinking
of the people that I know on the show and what they do.
Follow Up: Let's see...Jonathan
Penner...
Jeff: Jonathan is a writer and a
producer
Follow Up: ...and was on Grapevine, The Naked
Truth but those were guest spots.
Jeff: Jonathan is a working person in
show business in Hollywood. We knew that.
Follow Up: ...Somebody who used to be on
The Grind on MTV? A guitar player and a heavy metal...this
is somebody else's research...
Jeff: I want to do this. Don't
misread me. Guitar player is Billy Garcia. He's a
heavy metal guitarist. It has nothing to do with
Hollywood. What's interesting about him is he says "I
believe in the church of metal." That is one of his
quotes. He's not show business, he's a musician.
He's passionate about music and heavy metal.
Follow Up: A cop who has been a technical
advisor on cop movies and appeared on several one shot cable
reality shows.
Jeff: Who is that?
Follow Up: Cristina, she's a cop.
She's been a cop her whole life but she has worked in show
business.
Jeff: Let me just tell you, Cristina is
not only a cop, Cristina is a cop who was shot in the line of
duty in a somewhat notorious shootout down in Santa Monica, I
think on the pier. Her father was a cop who was killed in
the line of duty. To put Cristina in the category of an
actor, somebody looking to try and find a hole. Cristina
is a cop in her blood.
Follow Up: I understand but it seems as
if you tried to find people who...and this has happened in the
past...who were a little more likely to be interested in some
aspects of show business.
Jeff: If you said this to our casting
director she would probably fall over from exasperation.
It was the single biggest casting job we've ever had. It
got down to where we were literally calling Miss Korea Town
Pageant in Seattle, Washington to see if there were any females
in the ages 19 to 30 who might be interested in Survivor.
That's how deep we dug. So if we ended up with people who
you can extrapolate out and find some pentacle that
relates back to TV or show business maybe it's just more of a
sign of this world and that there's so much out there that
sooner or later that everybody is connected 6 degrees. I
guess the point is, I don't have an answer to your
question. I get it. I would say that I've always
been candid. I've always been honest in what I feel about this
stuff. This is the most fresh, diverse, interesting group
of people with completely varied backgrounds that I think we've
had since season one. To me it's not even worth
spending much more time when we have so many more interesting
things to talk about.
Follow Up: Now that you've had this kind of
casting. Can you see them going back to this kind of
casting in the future where race is not the issue but you just
want to have a much more diverse group?
Jeff: Absolutely. I was delighted
once this idea came along. You know, Mark has a lot more
at stake. It's his brand. It's his show, he's
risking a lot. And obviously CBS network has a ton at
stake. But for me, the white guy from Wichita who hosts
the show...I loved...the minute everything was a go, I felt in
my heart, we'll never go back, we can't. I think Mark knew
it as well. We just reinvented our show. It might
not be as dramatic...you might not feel the impact of that - that
we feel but it wouldn't surprise me if a few years from now
people look back and say, "Remember when Survivor did
that? And all the hoopla? And now it's more
commonplace?" That wouldn't surprise me at all and
is why I think it's such a positive idea because you're going to
see more ethnicities represented certainly on our show from this
point forward. Think about that. A young Hispanic
kid now gets turned onto Survivor because there's somebody he
can relate to and it opens up a world to him. Maybe he
decides to travel as a result of seeing this show. Or
maybe he sees something in this Hispanic kid that he can connect
with and he decides to go do what that kid does. Just the possibilities
of what could happen with this to me are endless.
Question: I wanted to talk to you about
some of the locals coming from the Bay Area, Yul and
Cecilia. Yul, I know was one you guys had to reach out to
the community to get. Can you tell me what these people
brought to the Survivor experience?
Jeff: Yul was one of the most
interesting guys. He is one of the most interesting guys
I've ever met. Without question one of the smartest
guys. Scored incredibly high on his IQ test. And not
surprising, was the only person, who, when he found out how we
were dividing the tribes, questioned it. He said,
"What I'm concerned is that what you're going to do is
portray stereotypes." And we said that we certainly
didn't go for that in casting. We weren't trying to stunt
cast this show. As far as the people on the show, we're simply
going to observe. And Yul was fine with that. I
don't know that Yul is even a huge Survivor fan.
Follow Up: I don't think he is.
Jeff: But he studied the show. As
somebody who wants to play this game and have a shot at winning
he's studied the show. I remember one of the comments he
made is that he did feel the show had integrity in it. He
was not concerned about that. We said, "We're not
going to do anything differently this season." Yul
was fine with it. Yul is a player. You underestimate
Yul, you'll be going home before he will. Absolute
fact. Cecilia, I think Cecilia was much the same
way. I don't think she was, I could be wrong on this, I
don't think Cecilia was super familiar with the show
either. Cecilia brings a completely different point of
view to the show. Cecilia is aware of her charm with
men. She's aware that is a valid way to play the
game. It's a valid way to live in society. To
navigate relationships with whatever tools you have.
Cecilia was one of the people that, when we were talking with
people in casting we had extensive conversations, we spent a lot
more time with people than we normally do. I remember with
Cecilia there was a lot of ethnic pride. There was no
question about her ethnicity. No question about where her
time was socially spent. With who it was spent.
That's kind of what triggered us into dividing into four
groups. Initially we just wanted to have 20 people with
different ethnicities but when we started sitting down and I
remember distinctly with Cecilia, we started realizing, wow her
life is steeped in culture that is different from ours.
Certainly from mine. That's when the idea came that we
should go with the positive thing of ethnic pride. Let
people have to figure out who to vote out on their own
tribe. Where in a sense all things are equal unless you
have differences within your culture, which we discovered
existed. Cecilia was sort of indirectly involved in
helping us discover the second layer of the idea which was the
division.
Question: One of the things that struck
me is hearing you talk about how diversity has energized the
show, some of us critics have been asking you guys to present a
more diverse cast on this show and on Mark's other shows for
years. I wonder why did it take you guys so long to try what a lot
of critics were asking you guys to try in the first place.
And why were you so surprised that by adding diversity you would
get a diversity of viewpoints. Which is exactly what we
have been saying for years.
Jeff: The first half of your question,
why did it take so long, I have to preface this by saying, I
don't run a network. So I don't know all the decisions
that go into that. I'm sure if I did it would make more
sense. TV is a business and at the end of the day it comes down
to advertisers and all sorts of things that I don't
understand. So I don't know why television is taking so
long to be representative of what this country is really
like. I only know that it's finally coming time with
Survivor and CBS and I'm glad about that. It's time. We
aren't going to go backwards. I hope we don't in my reign
with the show because I will fight hard against it and there
won't be any reason to. The show is too...it is absolutely
more interesting this season than last season for no other
reason than we have different points of view. You see
people make fire in different ways. In the first episode,
there's one guy who has a headache. There's another guy on
his tribe who refers to headache as "you've got a case of
the wind". He starts to massage this guy's head
really aggressively. And he says, "You're going to
get a little red dot but your headache's going to go
away." And you watch it and the guy goes, "Wow,
my headache's gone". And on camera, there, a red dot
appears on his forehead. You would never have seen that
last season. Because we didn't have that culture, that
ethnic group, that background, that history, that point of view
to life presented on the show. As far as why am I
surprised? I'm not surprised. It's a good question
because you make me realize that if I really sat down and
thought about it as a guy who grew up in Wichita, Kansas where
racial diversity still is going strong. There will be
people in the South who will think something different. So
I guess I'm not surprised. That's why I said those
opinions of people who are criticizing us are valid and fair and
they have their place. All I'm saying is, you have to
admit, you have to recognize you're condemning our show before
you've seen it. And that is not fair or just. So
keep the megaphone in your right hand and push that talk button
again when you've seen the finale and tell me if this was
everything you thought it was going to be. Or if maybe it
was a little actually inspiring and positive.
Follow Up: I think one of the reasons
why people have been critical is not just because they are
concerned about what the concept is but because they've seen how Mark
Burnett's shows have handled race. They've seen Gervase
Petersen, Sean Rector, the Omarosas. In the limited
instances that Mark Burnett's shows have handled race divisions,
they haven't handled them very well. They seem to have
cast people who were very stereotyped (?) including a black guy
who can't swim.
Jeff: Except for the first season I've
been in every casting session. I have thought that
everybody we put on the show was going to be great. With a
couple of exceptions, we've had a couple of people who didn't
perform well. For the most part I've been very happy with
everybody we've put on the show. For instance, if you have
a season and you only have one black guy and everybody else is
white. So you have 15 white people and one black guy and
that black guy doesn't perform or that black guy can't swim or
that black guy quits, it's like a beacon screaming that this is
poor casting or this is misrepresenting or you're portraying a
stereotype. But if you look across the board at all the
jackasses that we've had on the show who were white, all the
people who are white who can't swim, all the people who are
white who make the same ridiculous social mistakes, all the
white people who are lazy, all the white people who are
bigots. You could draw a list percentage wise that would
probably equal out. It just so happens most of the people
on the show have been white. I think the observation you
make is correct. I think the conclusion you've drawn is
not correct. I can tell that like with Osten. Osten
was working on Wall Street, from a good school, ripped
physically, one of the buffest guys we've ever had on the
show. And he was so well spoken in the room in terms of
social skills. We go in thinking Osten can win this
game. If he makes it to the individual portions nobody will
beat him. Not only does Osten not win the game, he doesn't
make it to the individual portion because he quits! Cause
he's tired! And worn out. You can't predict
that. And Osten regrets it. To this day he regrets
it cause he knows he let himself down. Sean Rector,
couldn't swim, you're right. We told Sean six weeks
before, we've had a lot of people who didn't know how to
swim. Cirie didn't know how to swim. She started
taking swimming lessons. Sean, it was a big thing for
him. Sean was on the boat before we get in there asking me
if there are sharks in this ocean. I said, "Sean,
there are sharks in every ocean, man." But one of the
greatest moments ever in Survivor, didn't even make the show, is
during a challenge with Sean where you had to dive down and get
a shell. There's five people and four shells. So
whoever doesn't come up with one doesn't get one. A white
woman bails because she can't dive. Nobody says anything
about that, she's out of the challenge. Sean tries to
dive, can't get a shell. He's about to quit. I'm
sitting on the dock, I go "Sean look where you are.
You're in the middle of the Marquesas Islands. You have a
free shot at this. She's already quit. We're never
coming back here and we're not leaving until you get a
shell. Sean looked at everybody, everybody started
encouraging him. Sean dove down, dove down, dove down,
forth time he dives down comes up with a shell. Now he
lost in the next round but he overcame a huge obstacle. Is
that a negative or a positive?
Follow Up: Well, we didn't get to see it
so we don't know.
Jeff: No, you didn't get to see it
because the show moves so fast and we had to keep the story
going onto who was winning. That's one of the unfortunate things
about the show. We could do 90 minutes every week and
nobody would be bored for a second but we only have 44
minutes.
Question: I'd like to go back to your
comments about being a white guy from Wichita. I'm a white
guy who grew up in El Paso so I grew up with a lot of
diversity. One of the things this casting concept has done
is kind of made me examine the lack of diversity in my
life. I wonder if it's made you examine what your life is
like in terms of diversity?
Jeff: It absolutely has. I grew up in
Wichita and did not have diversity. I had white and
black. The black community lived west of 13th street and
the white community lived east of 13th street. When I
moved back there to go to college my girlfriend got me an
apartment, I had moved away and she got me an apartment on 21st
Street. That was not my area. It was a completely
different world when I lived there. I had not been exposed
to it. I didn't know anybody who was Jewish. I
didn't know anybody who was Hispanic. I didn't know
anybody Asian-American. So I had a very limited
upbringing. Actually through Survivor and going to all
parts of the world I started meeting different people and we
have 25 different countries represented on our crew.
Here's a story that just happened to me a few days ago.
Maybe this will speak to the naiveté of my life still at
44. I'm at my dentist office, he's a white guy. He
brings in another doctor, he's an Asian guy. We're sitting
there and they're looking at my teeth. I found myself
without even thinking about it saying to the Asian doctor,
"Where in Asia are you from?" He said, "Oh,
we're Korean." And we had a little chat about
Korea. The only reason I had the courage to even ask that
question or the knowledge to ask that question was because I've
just spent 39 days with some people from Korea and I learned a
little bit about the fact that Asia has Chinese, Japanese and
Korean and Vietnamese and they don't necessarily get along. And
there's a hierarchy within that culture. Stuff that maybe
I should know as a human being that's lived 44 years. I
now feel like anything is okay to ask. I saw a guy this
morning and I said something about being African-American and he
said, "Actually I'm half and half. I'm white and I'm
black." He looked black and I'm like...God why did I
assume he's African-American other than saying, "What
ethnicity are you?" This show has completely changed
my perspective about how I view other ethnicities. Not in
terms of judging them but in terms of understanding that it's
okay to not know something. It's okay to ask a question because
I'm not from this world. The truth is, when I look around
my circle of friends, most of them are white. I don't know
why that is. When I look at most of my other friends it's
the same situation. I got back to what I said
earlier. The best experience that I've had on Survivor in
terms of opening my eyes this season, I loved learning new
slang. In casting we would ask a person what they thought
of other ethnic groups and hearing the stereotypes of what one
group has towards another and especially what every group has
toward whites, it's fascinating. It gives you insight into
how you're seen and how you see others.
Follow Up: This season will we get a
sense of people defying those stereotypes and the show is edited
for maximum impact so are we going to see racial strife, are we
going to see people defying stereotypes? Without spoiling
anything what can you say that we'll see out of this season?
Jeff: At the end of the day I think
you'll see that we handled it very responsibly and honestly and
in an entertaining fashion. We're certainly not setting
out to portray the basic stereotypes that everybody knows.
That's a waste of time and energy. It would have a
negative impact and do damage. We're not trying to do
that. On the other hand, we're not going to avoid anything
that does happen out there. These are simply 20
people. Do the five African-Americans represent the
African-American community? You have to ask them and I did
and, different points of view. Some said "Yeah
there's a responsibility." Some said, "Hell no,
I'm trying to win a million dollars and I don't really care what
your color is if you help me get there." It's a great
question, it's impossible to answer unless you watch the
show. I can tell you that your question comes up on the
show. And in fact in the second episode the notion of
stereotypes and when you perpetuate them comes up in the second episode
within one tribe. They have a debate about whether they're
helping to perpetuate their own stereotype. I mean by
behaving in a certain way. And it becomes an
argument. It's fascinating.
Question: Jeff, going back to why TV has
taken so long to be representative of society but you really
didn't address why Survivor has taken so long to get this
diverse cast and what prompted the producers to go in this
direction.
Jeff: What prompted us to go in this
direction started out very organically. Mark calls a
meeting and five or six of us sit down, it's the same people
every year. We're the creative nucleus. And we say,
alright, what are the ideas. And a lot of the time Mark
already has the ideas. He says, "This is what I want
to do." A lot of the time Mark will come in and he'll
say, "What do we have, what's on the board? What have
we talked about in the past that we haven't used yet? Maybe the
time is right or maybe this cast fits in a little better.
Or maybe the location speaks to it." And this time we
sat around and we all felt that from a competition point of
view, last season was very competitive. There was a night
where The Olympics, American Idol, Dancing With the Stars and
Survivor were all on. We're in our 12th
season. We realize we're still getting top 10 numbers but
we don't want to lose that. What can we do. So we
started talking about some ideas and this notion of what are we
criticized for? What could we turn on its head? The
thing that we're always criticized for is that "your show
is not ethnically diverse enough." In other
words: your show is too white. That's a sensitive
topic as we're seeing by all the reaction to this. So we
start saying, okay if we're going to do that and we could, we
have to do it. We cannot go half way. We can't just
have five people of color. We have to have an ethnically
diverse cast. You know Burnett, he wants it to be the most
ethnically diverse cast in the history of TV. Which suddenly
becomes pretty inspired and interesting. That's how that
idea started. And like I said, we didn't know that we were
going to divide them into groups based on ethnicity until we
started realizing how much ethnic pride there was and that
became something kind of fun and positive and it became a
creative idea. In terms of why we haven't done that
before, I'm not avoiding the question. I'll get lacerated
if I try to speak for Leslie Moonves and CBS. I don't know
why there is not more ethnic diversity and you're saying why not
on our show. I think it's about 85% of the people who
apply to our show are white. So we haven't really
considered going out and finding other people. We've had
plenty of people, thousands of people apply, still every season,
who want to be on our show. We don't want people who are
going to quit. We don't want to have to convince
you. You've got to really want to be on Survivor to get on
Survivor. Because if you say something in the casting room
like, "I think it would be fun to be on your
show." You're out the door. We're not looking
for that. We've seen you and you quit in episode
three. So we had plenty of people apply to do another
season, of 85% white people. Once we decided to be more
ethnically diverse we had to go out and get those people.
It wasn't a decision where CBS said, okay we're out of ideas, I
guess we have to do this. It came from a very organic
place and suddenly it was a good idea. The time is right and
let's do it.
Follow Up: I'm also wondering about the
behind the scenes diversity on Survivor. How many of the
top production team or producers...how many people of color are
in powerful positions?
Jeff: There are definitely people of
color behind the scenes. One of our most senior producers
is an African-American woman. One of the most senior
people at CBS who is involved in the show on a daily basis is
Asian-American. Our show is a rainbow in terms of the
creative team which extends to the photographers, all of that
team, 350 people who travel with this circus called Survivor -
last season I think we had 20 countries represented. We
have people that are all over the world that are our technicians
or our creative people or our editors or whatever. I feel
that the show is very diverse in terms of worldliness. If
you're asking can we have more diversity. We could always
have more diversity. Sometimes I think Burnett in his own naiveté,
his own desire for people to get along and be happy, I think
Burnett is misread sometimes. Conversations like this
never come up. I kind of feel like you're painting a
picture of a bunch of white people sitting around in a room
saying "I wonder what the minorities are thinking about
this." That is completely not the case.
Follow Up: One last question.
What's your reaction to the sponsors who have pulled out of the
show?
Jeff: It's amazing how momentum can
go. I heard that GM was out of the show months
ago. This is me, I'm just the host. I remember
I made a joke that it must have been because everybody who won
the car lost the show. It became a joke on the show that I
would say, "You're aware of the GM car curse? And you still
want to win this car?" "Yes, Jeff, I'm going to
be the one to break the curse." Well in 12 seasons
nobody ever broke it. I don't really know the reason
GM pulled out but I'm telling you on my family's name, they were
out months ago. And it could not have had anything to do
with race because we didn't even know that we were doing that
yet.
Question: The Jonathan Penner
situation. Is this going to be like Hogeboom or do people
recognize him and he fesses up to who he is?
Jeff: Naw, whatever guest stars that we
were referencing earlier, I don't know what they were but
Jonathan is a writer or producer, that's what he is known
for. And his wife is a director. They are a
Hollywood family but no, you'll never recognize Jonathan.
You'll certainly, though, remember Jonathan.
Follow Up: No one in the competition
recognizes him?
Jeff: No.
Follow Up: And you say that we'll
remember him. Why will we remember him?
Jeff: Jonathan is a great character.
What was fun about Jonathan is, he is a writer. He can be
very entertaining. He can be overly dramatic if it calls
for it. He can be understanding if that's what you
need. And he can lacerate you if he feels that's
appropriate. But he does it with such a delft touch that
it's very entertaining to watch. Jonathan makes an impact
early on because he's such a good storyteller.
Follow Up: I count about a dozen people
from California. I think 7 from L.A. Was that
a function of this need to go out and recruit. How did
this end up such a California-centric group of competitors?
Jeff: Probably in the sense that when
we're recruiting we're able to spend more time and resources in
California. I can tell you that we've reached out across
the country. And I know because a friend of mine told that
a friend of his just got a call from our casting director.
I said, "For what?" He said, "To be on the
show." I said, "Who is she?" He said,
"Well she's Korean and she was Miss Korean in Seattle in
1994." That's how deep we dug. At the end of
the day, you pick the 20 best people. As much as we'd like
to have somebody from Cincinnati and one person from Detroit
that would be great because then you would get rooting appeal
from those cities but you can't sacrifice that for the best
people. If the best people end up coming from L.A. then
that's where they come from.
Question: In terms of the sponsors who
reportedly pulled out of the show, General Motors, Home Depot,
Campbell's Soup, Coca-Cola, Proctor and Gamble, and Johnson and
Johnson. Have all of those sponsors pulled out of
sponsoring the show in recent weeks?
Jeff: No, no it was what I was saying
earlier. Home Depot has been a part of Survivor for a long
time. We know who our sponsors are going to be fairly
early on because we have to design...
Follow Up (interruption): Did these
sponsors pull out specifically because of the controversy over
the ethnic casting? The way in which you've done this
season?
Jeff: That's a question for CBS...
Follow Up (Interruption): Are these
companies still sponsoring...
Jeff: If you're going to ask me a
question let me answer or I'll say ask and answer and you can
write whatever the hell you want. I am the host of the
show. With all due respect to your question, I have never
ducked a question in 7 years of doing this show. I can't
say for all of those you just said. I know that when we
started doing creative on our show for the first time ever, we
didn't have any products that we needed to integrate into the
show and that was a bit of a shock because we always have in
previous seasons. This goes back 8 weeks before we even
stumbled upon this casting idea. This is when we're
designing the challenges and the rewards and figuring out do we
need to include Home Depot in some sort of a
challenge. CBS said "No, we're not going to
have any sponsors in the show." Why they pulled out
could be many different reasons. I would know if somebody
pulled out because they heard about this. The problem with
your question is that we already shot the show. So they
couldn't have pulled out in the last few weeks.
Follow Up: So they pulled out in hearing
about the show? So you guys did not make any changes to
the format when the sponsors began to make concerns?
Jeff: None of the people you are talking
about now were ever in this season. We started doing
our creative for this season five months ago. None of them
were in. We start building our challenges. We know
our location. We have our rewards and if that's the point
where we say, "Okay this is going to be the Home Depot
reward and what we're going to do is give them tools and get
them to build a bathroom which will tie into the Proctor and
Gamble reward." CBS marketing came to us and said,
"You have nobody to deal with this season. We have no
product integration in this show. You don't have to worry
about it." It was two months after that we started
casting and came up with the ethnic diversity. We already
had our challenges designed and starting to be built on
location. So simply from a time point of view sponsors
were out long before this creative idea came to be. And I'm not
even certain we would tell them that. I don't know that we
would. So for them to hear about it 3 weeks ago, they
couldn't pull out if they were a sponsor. They're already
in.
Follow Up: Besides General Motors are
any of the companies on that list not in this year, whether it's
product integration or simply as a sponsor of the show in any
form that have been in years past?
Jeff: You already know your answer, you
just want a quote from me. I'm just asking you that when
you write this story that you represent what I'm saying.
Only you will know if you're doing it because I'm really trying
to give you an answer. It's probably better answered by a
CBS exec but I'm on this call with you and I know what you're
going for. There are companies who have been a sponsor in
seasons past and they're not a sponsor on this season and to the
best of my knowledge and what I was told months ago, those
decisions where made long before what we were going to do
creatively with ethnic diversity and division.
Question: Jeff, this whole thing with
this ethnic diversity. You guys could have been good
citizens and gone out and created a great ethnic cast and put it
on the air and been done with it. I think what people are
getting stuck on is the divisions that you created here.
What was the debate like going into this? Should we do
this? Should we not do this?
Jeff: We actually felt that dividing
them ethnically was a positive idea because it came from our
discussions with them in casting when we kept coming up with the
same theme and that was ethnic pride. Which I have to be
honest, when you are just talking to a group of quote/unquote
white people, it doesn't come up. White people are just
mutts. We're just white. We don't have any ethnicity
that we hang onto unless you break us down to, well, I'm Italian
or I'm Irish or whatever. So when you start talking to
someone from Asia and you talk to another person and another
person and you realize, wow these guys all have different
backgrounds. And they all spend their Saturday afternoons
doing something different than I do. And they date
primarily within their own ethnic group. And they still go
back to Asia because their grandmother lives there.
Suddenly you start going, 'this is really powerful.' And
it's something that I'm not used to. Instead of
integrating everybody right from the start, now you have one
black guy, one Asian guy, one white guy and one African-American
guy why don't we start them in a grouping that would seem not
only fair but also would show pride. And now you have to
vote somebody out from your own group and that complicates
things. How are you going to do it? Because now it's
going to come down to who's contributing and who's not.
And knowing what Survivor is, pretty soon, we're not going to
leave you there for long, we're going to integrate you.
Now the question is, will you stick with your own ethnic group
because you've already made bonds or simply based on skin
color? Or more likely will you look to make alliances with
people who can provide shelter or provide fish or who you
like? In other words, people who will help you to the end
so you can win?
Follow Up: But doesn't that happen at
every outting(?) anyway? Maybe not in racial situations
but my tribe versus your tribe? People form relationships
and bonds in these tribes to begin with.
Jeff: Well, yes, the whole reason that
you divide people into groups initially is to try and give them
some identifiable grouping. So we've done old men/young
women, old women/young men, and we've done men versus
women. All those ideas come from the idea that let's
see if we can get them to say "okay we're this group",
"we're the old guys" or "we're the women",
"we're gonna beat the other team." This was an
obvious one. Let's spin it though in a positive way.
Let's take four different groups on ethnicity, put you in this
grouping, let you live together, let you figure out how you're
going to vote people off. Then let's see if those bonds
stick. Or if like in most cases they kind of get erased
and replaced with the people who best help you get to the
end. The reason you say that happens all the time is
because it does but when you talk about racial ethnicity I think
it's interesting. Because this is all just something we're
all just trying to work through. I like to believe that most of
us are in the middle and we want to live in a world in which we
can all get along. I don't believe most people are on the
extreme edge. To me this is a very worthy idea and the
very least will promote discussion. Like what we're doing
right now.
Follow Up: How long before the groups
are mixed up?
Jeff: I can't tell you that. I can tell
you this, the creative line that you're walking in terms of how
long to leave a group as a group before you split them up is all
along the lines of...you're asking yourself, "how long is
enough where they'll make a strong bond but not so long that
that bond becomes so strong they'll never break it?"
Because for our show to work creatively we need you to really
always be considering new options. We want you to consider
breaking that alliance. Not because it gives us great
arguments but because it keeps the audience guessing, 'are they
going to stay with their original alliance or are they going to
break rank?' You're building to the climax.
Question: Were there any incidents of
bigotry or racial or ethnic conflict? Or anything that was
troubling?
Jeff: You know, you really will
have to watch. I can't comment on that, that's the reason you'll
have to tune in to see how it all plays out.
Follow Up: You can't comment on
whether you found anything upsetting?
Jeff: I found...let me think what
I can say...my answer is not something I found troubling.
I was excited everyday whether it was a challenge or Tribal
Council. For the first time in a long time I had no idea what was going to happen.
And I wasn't sure that I was going to know the best way to
respond. I'm aware that I'm hosting the show and I'm
white. So I have my own set of experiences. How will I
relate to different people and are there things that I'll miss.
Or will I make judgments that are based on my own biases.
Who knows? So for me it was enormously exciting to be
vulnerable like that again and to be in it with all these other
people. Whatever happened out there is what
happened. I think when the
season is over, and if I'm wrong I'll eat crow, I'll eat my
words, I think it will go down as one of the 5 best
seasons we've had. We have heroes and underdogs like we
haven't had in a long time. And three love connections of
varying degrees. One of which is the strangest love affair
we've ever had on Survivor and I would argue that you've ever
seen on any reality show. There was more fish caught than
any of our past 12 seasons, octopus
caught. And a record number of blindsides at Tribal
Council. That gives you an indication to the level of
gameplay. That's a little unusual because these aren't
seasoned players. They understood instinctively that it's
very important to not necessarily tell the person you're voting
out that you're voting them out. That's why it's good to
have people who don't know the game that well play because they
tend to have more of a gut point of view.
Question: You asked us to wait
until we see it to form a judgment. I'm wondering if the
first episode without the last few minutes will be made available
for pre-screening as it sometimes has in past seasons.
Colleen Sullivan: No,
unfortunately we will not be making the premiere episode
available. You'll have to watch it on Thursday, September
14th.
Jeff: It's worth watching.
Question: I just want to
get the timeline straight. When you guys decided to go and
audition and pursue the auditioning diversely, when was it
roughly that you guys started to talk about "hey maybe we
should divide it up by teams."
Jeff: It was during one of the
casting sessions.
Follow Up: Early on or last
couple of weeks?
Jeff: The
way it works, our casting team, Lynne Spillman goes out and
looks at lots of people and she whittles it down to about a hundred
then 75 and then she presents to us about 50 or 60 people.
So it happens for us over the course of a few days. By the
second day is when we started noticing this theme.
Follow Up: There have been a
couple of times where you kind of adjusted the challenges. In
Men Vs. Women you didn't have many challenges involving raw
strength. When it was Old Vs. Young you didn't have many
quickness challenges. Can you think of any times when the
challenges were adjusted a little bit to keep it fair because
there might be some differences between the four groups?
Jeff: What Mark wanted to
emphasize this season...first of all we have some really fun
challenges...great underwater footage and all sorts of stuff
going on. He wanted one element in every
challenge, that was "thinking". If it was as a
group then you're going to have to work together or somebody is
going to have to lead you through some sort of a puzzle element
where you have to think. We have very few challenges that
are just based on brute strength, although we do have a couple,
we didn't shy away from them. His idea was - let's force
these guys to work together
in every capacity. And that goes back to starting the show with
the boat full of supplies and you get 30 seconds to get off what
you can. You have to work together right now. You
just met each other, you better start talking because that guy's
getting a spear and you're not.
Question: Were you especially
sensitive to how you phrased questions at Tribal Council so that
there wouldn't be any misunderstanding?
Jeff: No, and that's a deal I
made with myself. I've always approached this show from my
gut. I don't have the best
grammatical structure, I'm not an English major. I'm not
always the brightest guy. I shoot from my hip. But
slang was used that I didn't completely understand and I was
pretty sure - the audience at home - there would be people who
didn't understand it. I'd say, "What does that mean?
What does "snap" mean?" And I'd get an
explanation. Whether that makes it on the show I don't
know. That's why I'm saying that it's so exciting.
For me, I decided to let my guard down and just be who I
am. I am a 44 year old guy born and raised in Wichita with
my own set of experiences. I just want to learn
more. If I make mistakes or I say something insensitive, I
need to learn that.
Question: What about using 20
contestants, that has the potential to make this the longest
Survivor ever? Is that going to be the case?
Jeff: No, what it does is, it
gives us many more options. I would prefer that we took 20
people every time. It allows you to do fun things like get
rid of somebody surprisingly. It allows you to keep
the Survivors on their toes. Because they can no longer assume
that every three days they're going to get rid of
somebody. We could get rid of two people tonight. Or
we could get rid of somebody from every tribe this
afternoon. We've got enough people to play with
it.
Follow Up: You had 18 people one
time and got rid of two of them right there on the beach, right?
Jeff: No we had 20 in Palau and
we got rid of two on the beach. This is the most we've ever had
and I'll certainly be pushing to go 20 again because it's
fun.
Question: Do you agree with the
break in tradition and not show this to critics ahead of time?
Jeff: Again, I'm not in marketing
but honestly I'd probably make the same decision. Because
you are trying to get people to invest in this show. We
feel like if we get you to invest in the first episode, we have
a chance of keeping you. And we're hoping that new people
will watch the show. There's a certain point of
mystery. We don't want to spoil the surprise. I
don't mean to allude that there's some huge surprise in the
first episode. We just don't want to give it away.
Question: You alluded earlier to
the concept of rooting
interest? I haven't seen any particular studies one way or
the other but it does strike me that one of the reasons people
keep coming back to watch Survivor is they develop a rooting
interest for an individual or for a team. Have you
considered whether people this season will be developing those
preferences along racial lines?
Jeff: In answer to the question
of who will people be rooting for. I think it will be
varied. It wouldn't surprise me if people initially are
rooting based on ethnicity because they want their group to
succeed. I can tell you that there is a point in the show where
I'm almost positive you'll be rooting for underdogs, regardless
of ethnicity. I'm almost certain of that. There's a
turning point midway in this show that rocks it in such a
beautiful way. And at the end of the day I think you'll be
rooting for the people you like. At the end of this season if you go back and look over it as
closely as people are scrutinizing it now there is something to
be learned from this and that is, you root for people you
like. If you're a white guy and you got a tribe of white
guys who are all buffoons, I don't think people are going to be
rooting for them.
Question: You've mentioned several times
the sort of pride factor that the different teams had. Can
you speak at all to when the teams do merge, whether that
continues to keep a hold or whether people really do just start
looking out for number one?
Jeff: Well, I think from the get-go
there's always a sense of looking out for number one. This
is not like any other reality show. Survivor kicks your
ass. You never go to a hotel room. You never have a
shower unless you win a reward. You never have a fresh
meal. It's hard and you're out there because you do want
to win the game in most cases. But in answer to the
question whether the ethnic pride sticks once they are
integrated, I think it's a very good question. It is
a...it's uhhh...how to answer this one...whether or not people stay
together from their original groups once they integrate is a
topic that comes up. The question is, why would they stick
together? Is it just because we're both
African-American? Or because we have an alliance? Or
is it because we like each other? Or maybe we're
romantically involved? There are a lot of reasons you
might stay with somebody. Adding the division of ethnic
diversity is just one more reason that you might stick together
from your original group. I think you'll have to watch and
see and find out if it was anymore of a compelling reason.
Please credit:
Transcript by SurvivorFever.net
|